01 · Choose
Framework and project
Select the test stack and Jira project that will receive evidence.
Automated test management in Jira
Connect CI results, reusable BDD specs, and manual test cycles to your Jira releases—so QA, engineering, product, and delivery leaders decide from the same evidence.
Product view 1 of 3
A complete test run, not a status badge
Test management integrations
Native reporters and the Testream CLI publish structured results. Your existing CI/CD provider runs the command—no pipeline migration required.
Explore integrationsNative reporters and CLI
CI/CD providers
GitHub Actions
Any command-capable CITestream workflow
01 · Choose
Select the test stack and Jira project that will receive evidence.
02 · Configure
Use guided setup, a native reporter, or the Testream CLI.
03 · Verify
Confirm the first successful run before the workflow expands.
04A · Evidence path
Failures, artifacts, commits, environments, suite changes, and trends.
04B · Evidence path
Rovo-assisted drafting and evidence assessment with reviewer control.
04C · Evidence path
Pass, fail, blocked, and skipped manual outcomes with notes and files.
05 · Jira-native context
Evidence stays connected to delivery work, behavior, ownership, and versions.
06 · Decision layer
Inspect gaps, failures, coverage, cycles, and readiness before the ship decision.
Everything you need
Testream does not ask teams to choose between code-first automation and structured QA. It connects both to the Jira work and releases they already manage.
Send structured results from the frameworks and pipelines you already run.
Keep errors, stack traces, screenshots, traces, videos, and logs connected.
See which automated tests appeared, disappeared, or changed between runs.
Review pass rate, duration, recurring failures, and suite growth over time.
Automated evidence
Testream enriches Jira issues with the automated runs connected to that work, so product, QA, and engineering can see whether related tests passed, failed, or changed.
BDD coverage
BDD Specs and reusable Library behaviors give teams a practical Gherkin layer inside Jira, then compare each behavior against real captured test evidence.
Test cycles
Test Cycles turn reusable behaviors into lean execution batches, so manual QA results, notes, and uploaded evidence contribute to the same release picture as automated runs.
Release confidence
When test runs are linked to Jira releases, teams can review readiness from real evidence instead of stale spreadsheets, screenshots, or subjective status updates.
Built for Jira
Testream brings automated runs, behavior, manual validation, and release signal into the Jira work your delivery team already follows.
Before and after Testream
The product changes the evidence path—not the way engineers write and run tests.
Project-based pricing
Up to 1 Jira project
$0
For one Jira project. No credit card required.
Up to 3 Jira projects
$9.17
Billed annually at $329.99/year for up to 3 Jira projects.
Up to 10 Jira projects
$7.33
Billed annually at $879.99/year for up to 10 Jira projects.
Up to 20 Jira projects
$6.42
Billed annually at $1539.99/year for up to 20 Jira projects.
Frequently asked questions
No. Keep your tests in the frameworks your team already uses. Testream publishes the results into Jira so the evidence becomes easier to find, share, and act on.
Yes. Start with one Jira project, publish a first automated run locally or from CI, and expand when the team sees the value.
No. CI and test frameworks execute your tests. Testream makes their results visible in Jira, with run evidence, failure context, trends, and release signal attached to the work.
Yes. Testream includes reusable BDD Library behaviors and practical Test Cycles as core features, so manual QA evidence, notes, and uploaded files contribute to the same release picture as automated CI results without creating a separate manual test-case system.
Yes. Testream turns raw automated-test output into Jira-native quality context, so non-technical stakeholders do not need to read CI logs to understand risk.
When your reporter or upload workflow provides artifacts, Testream keeps them connected to the relevant test result and Jira context. Access stays aligned with your Testream and Jira project permissions, so screenshots, traces, and logs are visible to the people who are meant to review them.
Those tools are strong when teams need full manual test planning and governance. Testream is different: it brings automated CI evidence, reusable BDD behaviors, and practical Test Cycles into one Jira-native workflow so QA, engineering, and release teams see the same quality picture without duplicating test-case administration.
Start with one real run